Moderator Currently Offline Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Posts: 2500 Reputation: 18 [?] User Rank: Five-Star General
|
|
Quoting mrdozer2me Or you get the old "Never done one...but I'll try". Well, I'm not about to let my bike be the crash test dummy. So most of us have to go with the Race ECM.
someone needs to be the first. if they know what they are doing, they will always backup the original map before programming anything.
if they do that, they won't destroy your engine when mapping it on the dyno.
Quoting mrdozer2me
The other thing that I am misunderstanding is; once you "remap" your ecm isnt it set to run most efficently during the conditions it was programmed under?(like temperature, humidity..etc?) Where I live through most of the riding months the temperature can change by alot, one day it could be 90F and the next 70F. Wouldnt a piggy-back unit be better? One that can adapt to conditions as you ride?
the engine will run most efficiently when the engine temp is good => outside temp is of no influence, except for the time it takes to reach the engine temp.
to more input you can collect from your engine, the better it will run...
|