Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: Magpulronin (must see...)

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,470

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    335
    I dont mind it other then then front end. I agree with Dave about the rad being up front.
    I'd like to see someone do it with maybe one large rad mounted traditionally on a cr.

    What is with all these companies making these "concept" bikes with the huge front forks? Is this some new technology that is supposed to work better, because I think they look like crap!

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    335
    After looking at it more I understand. There is some sort of linkage that attaches to the trees and must be some sort of shock behind the rad. How could this be superior to the traditional setup though? Just for looks?

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    332
    After looking at it more I understand.Â* There is some sort of linkage that attaches to the trees and must be some sort of shock behind the rad.Â* How could this be superior to the traditional setup though?Â* Just for looks
    I can't imagine that it is. Isn't that the same setup that some old springers used?

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    302
    ****ers stole my nick!

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    405
    The front end suspension looks like a variation of the Norman Hossack "Duolever" style of fork used on some BMW's.

    Duolever fork

    It's an attempt to overcome the one inherent flaw with traditional forks. (they are very strong in compressive load, but relatively weak in torsional load, when you hit the brakes, the front wheel wants to bend the forks backward). The Doulever is a complex design with it's own issues so it hasn't really caught on.

    I would like to see that seat frame and exhaust pipe put on a CR though... now THAT would be a BAD ASS bike!

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    500
    I really dig the tail/tank piece! I may see if my father can fabricate a similar unit!

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    229
    Yep. It's a cantilever setup that BMW likes to use. The benefit is that the front end won't dive under braking which is good as it doesn't upset the chassis for handling.

  9. #19
    Senior Member Baal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,289
    I found that thing late last night, so hadn't thought through it much. I agree with the OP that a CR with a conventionally mounted radiator, that exhaust, and some of the other styling licks would be pretty evil. The Hossack fork is neat, and better looking than BMW's, weight might be an issue.

    But, it's all vaporware, eh?

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    612
    Very interesting bike ,looks like a fun spin. I love custom buells,though some of the components are kinds ugly on this one.
    How does it handle on the track?!



Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •